life :
friends when the environment exposed me radioactively with boredom and I slide in Anne Wills Talk Premiere after 5 minutes in a blissful deep sleep, then everything is dark red. Less because Anne Will and their boring guests yet more boring scenery, but because of the risk that present the larger than life periods to bring the vacation without power internships so with themselves. It is a well-known desire is regulated by the meaningful daily routine, devoted entirely to the service to the community or, alternatively, work on the next rung of the career ladder.
And that suits me the article by Wolfgang Engler to "work as an option" , a plea for a social contract in which the negative freedom is free from paid work (operational work) to live may, in the current leaves at all in my current mood world situation. Discuss the article but ostensibly only the question of the need to work a real option rather than the pragmatic questions, which makes a unconditional basic income and the effects it could have. The simple thought, one must first people to positive freedom (-snutzung) enable the utopian project that does not tip seems to me Engler get a little too short.
failed in the end, a (my) informed opinion on this subject but from a lack of knowledge, insufficient empirical work, I just know that I am skeptical, observing to myself: positive freedom is a hard-to-use matter, if you listen to pointless blogging, music , broadcasting posts consume and use generally do not count.
At the end, perhaps the realization that I like most the work, like the CSU is closer to the people. So I must consequently remain at Caritas, are a social worker. But since the money would be almost no chance of woman, child and home.
fact is: you should not do that, what makes a fun , because much of it is economically difficult to negotiate.
Jura:
friends, also through the leaves, I became aware of the deal under the criminal , in the U.S. plea bargaining already in everyday use. In German Criminal law is, in particular the Code of Criminal Procedure § 153a of importance. This is inter alia intended to speed up those same criminal procedure and free the overburdened courts of adequate working to stem the flood of litigation in smaller by § 153 Code of Criminal Procedure not covered cases.
§ 153 Code of Criminal Procedure, paragraph 1:
"With the approval of the competent for the commencement of the trial court and the accused may waive the prosecution for a misdemeanor being from the collection of public action and give both the accused conditions and instructions, if these are likely to eliminate the public interest in law enforcement, and the severity of the debt does not preclude. "
is interesting that this paragraph in particular in the well public outrage caring proceedings against Ackermann / Esser (Mannesmann) and Peter Hartz (VW affair) played an important role.
In the case of Ackermann / Esser involved the payment of 57 million € premiums shown to top executives of the previous Board of Directors of Mannesmann in the course of the transaction paid with Vodafone and the Supervisory Board in which Ackerman was approved. accused of was the men's and co-defendant infidelity gem. § 266 StGB .
The deal looked like this, that Ackermann and Esser Co., the court with a cash support (no Fine) of € 5.8 million as non-convicted men left, corresponding almost exactly 10% of the total damages.
It was also because of the unpleasant image that Joseph held the A. already before the trial began Fingered V into the camera. In case it
Hartz Dealt similar.
questionable and highly controversial in both cases, the application of § 153a, which does not actually provide conditions only "if they are capable of removing the public interest in prosecution" and if not where "the degree of fault not "precludes . Of these, one can speak in both cases and so is unlikely to be ultimately, the serious question whether the trade created with justice, the deal in the criminal trial, already has a system of double standards and become, above all, the rich and powerful of the Republic of the system as its own.
Thinking too late: the legislator should better not cancel Article 14 paragraph 2 GG , if you will spare him the accusation of cynicism?
0 comments:
Post a Comment